Im folgenden ein Test- und Erfahrungsbericht von Herrn Tom Licha zu unserem Skyglowfilter in 1¼- und 2" Duchmesser mit Standardeinschraubgewinde. Text und Abbildungen (mit Ausnahme der Filterkurve) © 2002 by Tom Licha |
|||
| Review: Baader Skyglow Filter 2 inch -
written on October 26, 2002 - ranked 8.6 out of 10 (5
Votes) |
|||
|
|||
| The
transmission is in peak about 94% and in most of the wanted spectra well around
90% which can be regarded to be very good. If we take into account the loss at
570nm we can estimate an overall transmission of about 75%. Please note that
the filter very well transmits the blue with cutting down near ultra-violett
which can be an advantage with some refractors (color aberration). Also note
that the filter cuts to the near infra-red which again can be an advantage when
using a CCD camera and a refractor. But for special purposes this sideeffect
might be unwanted. Test conditions The filter was tested with a Takahashi FS-60C refractor and a HX916 Starlight XPress CCD camera. Because of the very small pixels of 6.7 mym the HX916 it shows smallest aberrations in the optical train. Compare this pixel size to an average spot diagramm of a refractor showing spot sizes of several hundreth of millimeters in many cases! The filter was inserted about 55 mm before the focus. So there is enough space to include a filter wheel or other equipment. The test images were taken in the early morning with a 67% moon present. The transparency was fair but the big halo arround the moon indicated some fog in the sky. Before we look at the details in the test image have a look at two LRGB color pictures I accuired with the filter at that night. |
|||
|
|||
| These pictures show that the Skyglow filter
can be used for color photos as well. This is not true for several others like
the UHC from Lumicon and other high-contrast filters. For judging the overall
sharpness of the stars please keep in mind how sensitive the HX916 is to show
smallest aberrations. When I compare it to pictures taken with the same
equipment without the Skyglow I can state that the optical quality of the
filter is very good. Test photos The detailed test was performed on Andromeda galaxy. The HX916 is close to saturation within 35 seconds of exposure without the filter. With the filter included it needs 45 seconds for the same exposure level. That gives an overall transmission of 78% for that galaxy. Or in other words the exposure time has to be 22% longer. To minimize the effect of photon noise, read-out noise and thermal noise all examples below are an average of 9 frames. No filtering was applied. |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
|
And then the filter can do
it´s best. The faint stars clearly show against the sky background and
the halo arround the brightest star is dramatically decreased.
Conclusion The Baader Skyglowfilter is doing it's job very fine. If you are prepared to expose about 20% longer you can improve your picture quality considerably under less than optimal conditions. Taking into account the low price it is highly recommend. |
|||
| More images, taken with the
Baader Skyglowfilter you´ll find on my private Website
www.licha.de/AstroWeb/search.php3?sSearchText=skyglow Tom Licha, October 26, 2002 zurück zur Sektion 41 |
|||